‘Adieu’ to Poirot and Paris

Despite my great frustrations at the current moment I will do my best to tame my passions and recount to you calmly the occurrences of my meeting with Hercule Poirot:

To those among you who hoped that this meeting between Mr. Poirot and I would harken the beginning of complete reconciliation and friendship – a partnership even of great minds – I regret that I do not bring such good news. While we have removed our mutual suspicions of ill-intent, Mr. Poirot stubbornly refuses to trust even my own identity, let alone my worth as a contact or my usefulness as an ally. Therefore I decided not to further inflame our joint irritations and hence have decided to pursue little more than a tacit truce with the man.

Surprisingly, the conversation amongst ourselves started off rather well, if admittedly light. We both discussed amongst ourselves our favor for the city of Paris and the dreary drizzly weather we faced. We enjoyed some nice veal appetizers. He described to me the details of a fascinatingly complicated case involving a locally renowned family in which the murder of the patriarch Comte de Cavaignac revealed terrible scandal and viciousness among its parties. I decided in turn to discuss my own intrigue with Ms. O’Shea.

That was when the positive attitude of the conversation quickly reversed.

For Poirot sought to question me – not on the details of the case, but why I should take on a case at all! He asked me why I continued – why I should proceed in pretending to be Sherlock Holmes, a detective of fiction which he confessed that he greatly admired. He asked me whether or not I thought of it as some kind of ruse, some sort of personal nickname for myself, or whether I was deluded enough to believe I was in truth Sherlock Holmes. Upon tolerating this rather well, I told him that I am who I said I was – the famous detective Sherlock Holmes. And how I came to come into this world where people perceive me as being fictional and legendary I do not know, but calling myself by that name was no pun or jest but was the blunt truth.

He immediately scoffed this away and said that he had heard before of these rumors – “if we should call them so” by his words – that characters of fiction were roaming around the real world; he said that, though such claims were levied against him that he was fictional, he quickly convinced claimants otherwise by saying that he was real and somehow arrived in this present day and age by some method unknown to him. It was impossible that I – by which I mean, Sherlock Holmes – could ever be real as some sort of fiction suspended in fact.

With much irritation I angrily told him that I least of all wished to view myself as fictional – or so you call it – not merely for the severe moral and mental difficulties that come with such a revelation but also the punishing difficulties of logic that it presents. But, I told him, my tenet was to eliminate the impossible, and it was impossible, when I should enter mysteriously into a future day and age where people knew me as fictional and moreover could account for the author and his sources, that all society should be so mistaken and that I was in fact real, when I could not account for it. And it is my solemn principle that once I have eliminated the impossible, what remains – however improbable – must be true.

His unwillingness to listen to this further indicated that I could not persuade him, so I decided to leave before my main course, saying that judging by his build he was well suited to finish it for me. But I told him in leaving that I was disappointed that a man so perceptive would miss what was right before his face, and that perhaps he would see if he carried and wore his pince-nez more often! I also pointed out the luck that I was moving to New York soon, so that Poirot would never have to see me again.

As soon as I got home I got into contact with my unnamed benefactor and requested to go immediately. He informed me that arrangements were already prepared for me to go to America and that I could leave that night if I should so choose. I gratefully accepted his offer, and am packing my meager materials for departure.

I do not know if Poirot will ever come to his senses or if I will see him again. Frankly I have decided that such a decision is not mine but his to make.

To the proud city of New York tomorrow!

Sherlock Holmes

P.S. I have just opened up a new website at holmesinvestigations.net; use it to send me a case or if I formally request your services. Otherwise continue to post your comments; it is the best way to informally get in touch with me.

6 thoughts on “‘Adieu’ to Poirot and Paris

  1. I am sorry to hear about your rather unsuccessful meeting. I had rather hoped that something would come of it, but at the same time I suspected that it would fail.

    You have done what you can, however, and I am very grateful for it. If Poirot cannot be convinced of the situation, we will just have to accept things and work with them as they are.

    You should, for the moment, put aside concerns about your own existence. You are obviously as capable of free, unhindered action and thought as any other man. Whether one world sees you as fictional obviously does not hamper this ability, and therefore, is irrelevant except as a curiosity.

    In any case, I wish you the best of luck in your new business in my home country. I’ll keep an eye out for another update, this one from my side of the Atlantic.

    ~Sicon112

    • Ah! I almost forgot! I shall keep you updated should any of the other Persons Of Interest that we are following arrive in your general area. As far as I know, the only New York related lead we have is a video of what we believe to be Cinderella appearing in the city. Unfortunately, the video was taken a good deal of time ago, and we have no follow up information.

      The footage in question appears at the very end of this video, should you feel like looking at it.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9XZ6lOIeJw&feature=plcp

      I am not requesting that you specifically look for her; that would be ridiculous. New york is huge and we have no evidence to go by. I am just preparing you to act in the case of a coincidence.

      Should any other POIs enter your area, or you theirs, I shall inform you immediately, as some of them are rather unpleasant fellows.

      Good day, Holmes!

      ~Sicon112

  2. Ah, c’est la vie.

    Regardless, would you be interested in looking into a case in Boston, so long as you’re coming to the U.S.? There’s someone around there who may or may not be a serial killer–I’m in contact with his therapist and I’m concerned for her safety.

  3. I’m glad you no longer suspect one another of the viscious crimes that have been circling nonetheless, it’s quite a relief to see. I’m sorry your meeting did not go better, but thus is life. :) You are what you are sir, and if he fails to see so… well, his loss, I suppose. It is a shame.

  4. Dear Mr. Holmes:

    I am deeply saddened and disappointed that your meeting did not go well. I hope that Poirot will trust you soon- he is just a bit shocked from discovering that he is fictional.

    Go to Boston after New York. We suspect he may be a serial killer, a particular barber from Fleet Street, London. And look for a beautiful homeless girl in New York who has lost a shoe.

    I hope you will be fine in the Big Apple- New York.

    The Wild West Pyro

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>